Google gravity

Google sketch up

Google sketch up is the new application of Google which has appeared very interesting to me, as always google applications have lived up to their expectations.Google sketch up is an open source version  to well known CAD ,software used to create three dimensional images and design.Guess what it is easier to use,i can guarantee you that if you sit with for a half an hour ,you will be able to make your own 3D design.It is a small sized app and very convenient to make 3D design.Once a design is made,the designer has the flexibility to make images of the design in different angles in JPEG format. The various tools are easy to understand ,there are templates available to use directly ,saving your time.There are measuring tools ,just in case you want your design to have proper dimension ratio.

This is one of the design ,i came across

It is easy to make a design in sketch up, the few tools which might be new to user are 3 D projection tool and offset tool .

you just use projection tool to drag in the direction of projection needed

Apart from this others are self understandable .

People all over the world have used this software to design things which are not technical, just to pass their time.It has become the new 'Paint'...

Hats off to Google for making such a dynamic and useful application...I personally feel everyone should try this application once.

google/recent events/The Pluses and Minuses of Google+

It’s clear that Google has created an interesting suite of tools and is trying to take advantage of how people rely on their social networks to discover new content.These days, you may rely on your social networks to find the latest news or funny cat videos rather than using search. Google+ clearly is an attempt to move with the times.But does it work? The short answer is that there’s a lot of potential in Google+. We’ve heard that before — Google Wave was a tool that had nothing but potential. But it was hard to define what Wave did in a way that made sense to the average user. In some ways, Google+ falls victim to the same problem. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages. We’ll start with the pluses:

Google+ uses “Circles” to help you group people into categories and makes it easy to share content with specific people. I have circles for my friends, my family and my professional peers. Creating circles is easy and Google+ uses a simple drag-and-drop interface to let you add people to each circle. You can add the same person to multiple circles if you like.

Sharing using circles is a breeze. If I want to share a funny story about my day, I may only want my friends and family to see the post and keep the rest of the world in the dark. No problem, I just select those circles when I create the content and everyone else is spared my anecdote. Or I might choose to share it with the world and keep the post Public, meaning anyone could read about my hilarious misadventures.

The hangout feature is a blast. Hangouts let you create a video chat room with up to nine other people. Whomever is talking — or speaking more loudly than anyone else — takes center stage. As one person finishes speaking and someone else begins to chat, the main video feed switches automatically. Considering most of the people I know on Google+ right now are tech journalists, this feature makes it feel like you’re hopping from one podcast to another.

The Android integration is great, particularly for huddles. Huddles make it easy to create a social group on the fly. Imagine you want to organize a quick get together among friends but you don’t want to broadcast it to the world at large. Creating a huddle lets you send messages to this specific group while excluding everyone else. Everyone in the group can read and respond to messages, turning the huddle into a party line. This is sort of what Twitter was supposed to be and what services like Beluga are doing now.

Sharing photos is easy. You can create photo albums, tag people and share images with whichever circles (or the public at large) you like. I have some images that anyone can see and others that only my friends have access to. And if you have Google+ on your phone, the instant upload feature makes it insanely simple to share a photo snapped by your phone that very second.

Now let’s look at some of the minuses as I see them:

It’s still a little confusing, though nowhere near as mystifying as Google Wave was.

Many of the features in Google+ are in other social networking sites or services. Facebook lets you create filters (though it’s not quite as easy or intuitive as it is in Google+). Beluga lets you create quick messaging groups among a set number of people. Google+ might be a solution looking for a problem that doesn’t exist. I’m not sure there’s enough there to compel people to use it in place of (or in addition to) other services.

Sparks, a Google+ service that pulls links related to your interests, hasn’t blown me away yet. I can’t see it replacing Google Reader or other RSS services for the moment. But maybe that will get better as time goes on.

I know a lot of people who have multiple email addresses, apparently. I don’t see an easy way in Google+ to consolidate these addresses into a single contact. I know I can do that in gmail and fix the problem that way but it would be nice to be able to do it in Google+. There may even be a way to do it and I just haven’t seen it yet.

Pulling content from other sources such as Facebook, Flickr or even YouTube isn’t intuitive. And it’s a little perplexing that YouTube compatibility isn’t built in at the beginning considering it belongs to Google. You can share videos on your Google+ stream but you have to upload them — you can’t just link to a YouTube account. I hope Google adds in a YouTube feature in a subsequent version of Google+.

It’s also difficult to really see the full potential of Google+ with such a small number of users. I don’t count that as a minus — Google wants to give the product a field test before unleashing it upon the world at large. But it does mean that getting a handle on exactly how useful all the features will be once the service goes gold is a bit tricky.

For the moment, Google has put a freeze on invitations to the network. I know that’s frustrating for people who really want to give the service a try but it makes sense from a quality assurance perspective. Will Google+ manage to do to Facebook what Facebook did to Myspace? We’ll have to wait and see

internet/recent/Google's New Social Network: Google +

Google's New Social Network: Google +

It is weird, I have yet to see Google +, Google's newsocial network, myself. I was on the pre-invite list but for some reason, the invite never came and I am locked out. It is very weird for me to write about something that I did not experience first hand and also very weird for me to not have access to a new Google product early.

That being said, everyone else at Search Engine Land has been having a blast teasing me about having access to Google Plus. The SEL team has been 'huddling', 'sparking' conversations, creating 'circles' without me, and even doing 'hangouts' without me - so I feel a bit left out.

Okay, in all seriousness, the reviews seem fairly positive. Since I cannot give you a first hand recount, I recommend reading Danny Sullivan's Google + review and Greg Sterling'sfirst look.

Google has a very easy to understand overview of how Google + works over atgoogle.com/+/learnmore/ - so check that out.

internet/Google's doodles creating a sensation ,attracted 740 million users...

Google's latest doodle imitates lunar eclipse

ShareThe world's most popular search engine's newest personalised logo replicates the different phases of Wednesday's lunar eclipse.

Zoom in

If bad weather impeded your view of Wednesday's lunar eclipse, do not despair: Google's latest doodle is a replication of the phenomenon, from beginning to end.

The well-known search engine has taken the opportunity of the most recent lunar activity to publish its latest personalised logo. The eclipse could be seen in most of Europe, though visibility in the Basque Country was seriously affected by rain cloud.

The lunar doodle substitutes the second 'o' of Google for an image of the moon, though it goes much further than that: By moving the little interactive knob up and down the scale which appears underneath the logo, the user can witness a reproduction of Wednesday's eclipse in all its phases.

Google frequently marks important events, anniversaries and birthdays of historic characters from the worlds of cinema, music or science, so this latest 'eclipse' doodle is no exception.

This year alone, through its doodles Google has paid homage to dancer Martha Graham, British children's author and illustrator Roger Hargreaves and ornithologist John James Audubon.

However, undoubtedly its most famous doodle to date, and the most tried and tested among Google users, was the one it brought out last week to celebrate the birthday of the late father of the electric guitar, Les Paul.

On that occasion, Google substituted its usual logo for an electric guitar that allowed the user to play solos with the mouse or the keyboard. It attracted around 740 million users, the equivalent of 10.7 million man hours, according to Australian news.com. Unsurprising perhaps, as many worked out how to play some famous tunes on the doodle.

Only time will tell if Google's latest doodle is such a huge sensation.

software/Google Advanced Operators

google Advanced Operators
Google supports several advanced operators, which are query words that have special meaning to Google. Typically these operators modify the search in some way, or even tell Google to do a totally different type of search. For instance, "link:" is a special operator, and the query [link:www.google.com] doesn't do a normal search but instead finds all web pages that have links to www.google.com.
Several of the more common operators use punctuation instead of words, or do not require a colon. Among these operators are OR, "" (the quote operator), - (the minus operator), and + (the plus operator). More information on these types of operators is available on the Basics of Search page. Many of these special operators are accessible from the Advanced Search page, but some are not. Below is a list of all the special operators Google supports.

Alternate query types

cache:	If you include other words in the query, Google will highlight those words within the cached document. For instance, [cache:www.google.com web] will show the cached content with the word "web" highlighted. This functionality is also accessible by clicking on the "Cached" link on Google's main results page. The query [cache: ] will show the version of the web page that Google has in its cache. For instance, [cache:www.google.com] will show Google's cache of the Google homepage. Note there can be no space between the "cache:" and the web page url.
link:	The query [link: ] will list webpages that have links to the specified webpage. For instance, [link:www.google.com] will list webpages that have links pointing to the Google homepage. Note there can be no space between the "link:" and the web page url. This functionality is also accessible from the Advanced Search page, under Page Specific Search > Links
related:	The query [related: ] will list web pages that are "similar" to a specified web page. For instance, [related:www.google.com] will list web pages that are similar to the Google homepage. Note there can be no space between the "related:" and the web page url. This functionality is also accessible by clicking on the "Similar Pages" link on Google's main results page, and from the Advanced Search page, under Page Specific Search > Similar.
info:	The query [info: ] will present some information that Google has about that web page. For instance, [info:www.google.com] will show information about the Google homepage. Note there can be no space between the "info:" and the web page url. This functionality is also accessible by typing the web page url directly into a Google search box.

Other information needs

define:

The query [define:] will provide a definition of the words you enter after it, gathered from various online sources. The definition will be for the entire phrase entered (i.e., it will include all the words in the exact order you typed them).

stocks:

If you begin a query with the [stocks:] operator, Google will treat the rest of the query terms as stock ticker symbols, and will link to a page showing stock information for those symbols. For instance, [stocks: intc yhoo] will show information about Intel and Yahoo. (Note you must type the ticker symbols, not the company name.) This functionality is also available if you search just on the stock symbols (e.g. [ intc yhoo ]) and then click on the "Show stock quotes" link on the results page.

Query modifiers

site:	If you include [site: ] in your query, Google will restrict the results to those websites in the given domain. For instance, [help site:www.google.com] will find pages about help within www.google.com. [help site:com] will find pages about help within .com urls. Note there can be no space between the "site:" and the domain. Advanced Search page, under Advanced Web Search > Domains.
allintitle:	If you start a query with [allintitle:], Google will restrict the results to those with all of the query words in the title. For instance, [allintitle: google search] will return only documents that have both "google" and "search" in the title. Advanced Search page, under Advanced Web Search > Occurrences.
intitle:	If you include [intitle: ] in your query, Google will restrict the results to documents containing that word in the title. For instance, [intitle:google search] will return documents that mention the word "google" in their title, and mention the word "search" anywhere in the document (title or no). Note there can be no space between the "intitle:" and the following word. Putting [intitle:] in front of every word in your query is equivalent to putting [allintitle:] at the front of your query: [intitle:google intitle:search] is the same as [allintitle: google search].
allinurl:	If you start a query with [allinurl:], Google will restrict the results to those with all of the query words in the url. For instance, [allinurl: google search] will return only documents that have both "google" and "search" in the url. Note that [allinurl:] works on words, not url components. In particular, it ignores punctuation. Thus, [allinurl: foo/bar] will restrict the results to page with the words "foo" and "bar" in the url, but won't require that they be separated by a slash within that url, that they be adjacent, or that they be in that particular word order. There is currently no way to enforce these constraints. Advanced Search page, under Advanced Web Search > Occurrences.
inurl:	If you include [inurl: ] in your query, Google will restrict the results to documents containing that word in the url. For instance, [inurl:google search] will return documents that mention the word "google" in their url, and mention the word "search" anywhere in the document (url or no). Note there can be no space between the "inurl:" and the following word. Putting "inurl:" in front of every word in your query is equivalent to putting "allinurl:" at the front of your query: [inurl:google inurl:search] is the same as [allinurl: google search].

software/Google -The search engine-my views...

Google has been by far the most amazing on the internet.It has wide range of products,it has actually created a revolution on the net itself...and added the word google it to the dictionaries of young generation....But actually i think that the search engine optimization techniques should more user friendly and better,because the problem i get is when i search on topic such as robotics i get millions of pages of results...though i know that the problem is on my part that should google the specific thing  i need and use the SEO(search engine optimizing) techniques,i still think there should some friendly user interface to the engine ..like for example what my  idea is show results divided into different categories, for robotics ,i should get learning robotics,robotics companies etc...
this will actually improve the product more....